USPTO serial 75923658
COLORLINE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 2742623Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jul 29, 2003
- Examiner
- DEJESUS, YSA
- Law office
- POST REGISTRATION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with COLORLINE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
RICHARD G. MARTIN
RICHARD G. MARTIN FRASER CLEMENS MARTIN & MILLER LLC28366 KENSINGTON LANEPERRYSBURG, OH 43551UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 017 | FIBERGLASS REINFORCED PLASTIC SHEETS FOR USE AS SUBSTRATES FOR PRINTING THROUGH A SUBLIMATION PROCESS, NAMELY, A PROCESS BY WHICH SPECIALLY FORMULATED INKS ARE CONVERTED FROM A SOLID TO A GAS FORM UNDER HEAT AND PRESSURE SO THAT IT CAN PENETRATE AND BOND WITH A SURFACE | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Mar 1, 2000 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 12, 2018 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Mar 7, 2014 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Jun 1, 2011 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Oct 30, 2008 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Oct 28, 2008 | PLGL | ASSIGNED TO PARALEGAL | — |
| Oct 24, 2008 | E815 | TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 14, 2007 | CORV | REVIEW OF CORRESPONDENCE COMPLETE | — |
| May 25, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 2, 2007 | CORV | REVIEW OF CORRESPONDENCE COMPLETE | — |
| Mar 26, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 28, 2007 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Jul 29, 2003 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jun 19, 2003 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| May 27, 2003 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| May 14, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Apr 24, 2003 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Mar 3, 2003 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Mar 3, 2003 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| Sep 3, 2002 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jun 11, 2002 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| May 22, 2002 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jan 10, 2002 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 20, 2001 | REIN | REINSTATED | — |
| Sep 19, 2001 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 16, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 15, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 31, 2001 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Sep 12, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 1, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 17, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |