USPTO serial 75923925
MUGGLES
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- CARRUTHERS, SUE
- Law office
- PETITIONS OFFICE
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with MUGGLES?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Mechanicsburg, PA
Goods and services
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 19, 2010 | PRRD | PETITION RECONSIDERATION REQUEST DENIED | — |
| Nov 18, 2010 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Nov 16, 2010 | PRRR | PETITION RECONSIDERATION REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 16, 2010 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 16, 2010 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 9, 2010 | PETD | PETITION TO REVIVE-DENIED | — |
| Mar 9, 2010 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Feb 24, 2010 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 24, 2010 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 1, 2009 | MAB0 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INCOMPLETE RESPONSE | — |
| Apr 1, 2009 | ABN0 | ABANDONMENT - INCOMPLETE RESPONSE | — |
| Sep 3, 2008 | RECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON MAILED | — |
| Sep 3, 2008 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Aug 11, 2008 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Aug 11, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 8, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 19, 2008 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 19, 2008 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Feb 23, 2008 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Feb 23, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 22, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jan 23, 2008 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 27, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 27, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 8, 2007 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Jan 8, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jun 11, 2006 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Nov 15, 2005 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| May 9, 2005 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Oct 25, 2004 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Sep 9, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Aug 26, 2004 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Feb 26, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 17, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 17, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 3, 2003 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Sep 12, 2003 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 12, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 6, 2003 | REIN | REINSTATED | — |
| Jul 23, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 23, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 22, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 22, 2003 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 11, 2003 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 2, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 7, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 31, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 11, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 23, 2001 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Feb 2, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 8, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 1, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 28, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |