USPTO serial 75924628
LOOK-HEAR
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BENMAMAN, ALICE
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 116 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with LOOK-HEAR?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
CRAIG J.J. SNYDER
CRAIG J J SNYDER67 WALL STNEW YORK, NY 10005UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Sound Recordings Featuring Musical Performances, Dramatic Performances, Comedic Performances, Instructional Lectures and Seminars, and Stories For Adults and Children; libraries and compilation of sound recordings of others in the nature of entertainment performance, comedic performance, music performances, information, general advice, business advice, and educational advice via compact disk, diskette, magnetic tape and downloaded from the Internet; video recordings featuring musical performances, dramatic performances, comedic performances, instructional lectures and seminars, and stories for adults and children; libraries and compilations of video recordings of others via compact disk, diskette, DVD, laser disk, magnetic tape and downloaded from the Internet; video, sound, holographic, television and motion picture recordings of entertainment performances, comedic performances, music, performances, information, general advice, business advice and educational advice via compact disk, diskette, DVD, laser disk, magnetic tape and downloadable from a global computer network; computer software for viewing live and pre-recorded broadcasts via computer, recorded on disc or CD-ROM or downloaded from the Internet; computer software for preparation of sound and video recordings, namely, managing, editing, copying, inputting, processing and networking video, sound and motion picture media in machine readable form, recorded on disc or CD-ROM or downloaded from the Internet; computer software for distributing video, sound and motion picture media via the Internet, recorded on disc or CD-ROM or downloaded from the Internet; computers for management, editing, copying, inputting, processing and networking video, sound and motion picture media in machine readable form and distribution of video, sound and motion picture media via a the Internet | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 21, 2007 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 21, 2007 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 16, 2007 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jan 15, 2007 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 10, 2007 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jan 10, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jun 16, 2006 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jun 15, 2006 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 14, 2006 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 8, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 8, 2006 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 21, 2006 | UNDN | UNDELIVERABLE MAIL - NO ACTION TAKEN | — |
| Feb 13, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 4, 2006 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jan 4, 2006 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 27, 2005 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Sep 12, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 27, 2005 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jun 24, 2005 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 24, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 23, 2005 | REIN | REINSTATED | — |
| Mar 9, 2005 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 9, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 10, 2004 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 10, 2003 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Apr 21, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Oct 16, 2001 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Feb 10, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 11, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 4, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 2, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |