Drawing for PURPLEYOGI

USPTO serial 75926302

PURPLEYOGI

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
EDWARDS, ALICIA COLLINS
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with PURPLEYOGI?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Roger T. Barrett

ROGER T BARRETT TOWNSEND AND TOWNSEND AND CREW LLPTWO EMBARCADERO CTR 8TH FLSAN FRANCISCO, CA 94111-3834UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Computer software for facilitating personalized web and intranet searches and content delivery services, namely, software for collecting, linking, organizing and prioritizing data from multiple sources into a hierarchical display, and content, data and database management software; enterprise software, namely, software for enhancing customer relationship management software, sales force automation software, corporate portals, search engines and news aggregation servicesACTIVE
042Computer services, namely, web and intranet based search, personalization and content delivery services, namely, services for developing, installing, implementing, configuring, updating, consulting on and maintaining software for collecting, linking, organizing and prioritizing dataACTIVE

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Sep 29, 2004MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Sep 29, 2004ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Aug 5, 2004CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS
Feb 9, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Feb 4, 2004EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED
Feb 4, 2004EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED
Oct 14, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Aug 29, 2003EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED
Aug 5, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Aug 1, 2003EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED
Feb 4, 2003NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Nov 12, 2002PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Oct 23, 2002NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION
Apr 17, 2002CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Mar 28, 2002CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED
Sep 28, 2001CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Sep 15, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Mar 5, 2001CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Aug 28, 2000CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 26, 2000DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance