USPTO serial 75928032
TIGER TIGER
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- CHOINIERE, MONIQUE
- Law office
- PRE-PUBLICATION FINAL REVIEW
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with TIGER TIGER?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Nottingham NG7 2UT, GB
Nottingham NG7 2UT, GB
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Surjit P. Soni
SURJIT P SONI THE SONI LAW FIRM55 S LAKE AVE STE 720PASADENA, CA 91101UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 029 | Dried pulses, namely, dried chick peas, dried red lentils, dried green lentils, dried red beans, dried black eye beans, dried soy beans, dried long beans; and Processed pulses, namely, processed chick peas, processed red lentils, processed green lentils, processed red beans, processed black eye beans, processed soy beans, processed long beans | ABANDONED | — |
| 030 | Spices, chili powder, turmeric powder, coriander, cumin,pepper, cinnamon, caradamom; Herbs, namely, oregano, mint, and sage; and Unprocessed grains, namely, jasmine rice, glutinous rice, basmati rice; Food products, namely, rice sticks, rice vermacellis, noodles | ABANDONED | — |
| 031 | Unprocessed grains for eating; and Fresh pulses, namely, chick peas, red lentils, green lentils, red beans, black eye beans, soy beans, long beans | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 15, 2005 | MAB4 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Jun 15, 2005 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Jun 15, 2005 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jun 15, 2005 | ABND | ABANDONMENT DELETED BY TTAB | — |
| Jun 10, 2005 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Feb 28, 2005 | ABN5 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER PUBLICATION | — |
| Feb 25, 2005 | EXAR | TEAS EXPRESS ABANDONMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 9, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Mar 29, 2004 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Dec 19, 2002 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 5, 2002 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Oct 16, 2002 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Sep 7, 2002 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 21, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 21, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 14, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 13, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 14, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 28, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 31, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 3, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 25, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |