Drawing for CRYSTA

USPTO serial 75930820

CRYSTA

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
ESTRADA, LINDA M
Law office
DIVISIONAL UNIT

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with CRYSTA?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

roberta jacobs-meadway

CYNTHIA B SUMMERFIELD PHARMACIA CORPORATION100 RT 206 NPEAPACK, NJ 07977UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
005Pharmaceutical preparations for the treatment of diabetes and related conditions, namely, vision impairment and blindness, and for the prevention and treatment of cardiovascular conditionsACTIVE

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jan 26, 2005MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jan 26, 2005ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jul 19, 2004CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS
Mar 11, 2004EX5GSOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED
Mar 2, 2004EXT5SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED
Mar 2, 2004EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Sep 9, 2003EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED
Sep 2, 2003EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED
Sep 2, 2003EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Sep 2, 2003TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED
May 13, 2003EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED
Mar 3, 2003EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED
Mar 3, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Dec 13, 2002EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED
Oct 11, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Oct 10, 2002EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED
Mar 28, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Mar 25, 2002EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED
Mar 25, 2002EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED
Oct 16, 2001NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jul 24, 2001PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jul 11, 2001NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION
Feb 12, 2001CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Oct 3, 2000CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Aug 1, 2000CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 28, 2000DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance