USPTO serial 75932174
E SPEC
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3280259Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Aug 14, 2007
- Examiner
- DOMBROW, COLLEEN M
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with E SPEC?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Honda Giken Kogyo Kabushiki Kaisha
Minato-ku, Tokyo, JP
Other trademarks owned by Honda Giken Kogyo Kabushiki Kaisha
Honda Giken Kogyo Kabushiki Kaisha
Minato-ku, Tokyo, JP
Other trademarks owned by Honda Giken Kogyo Kabushiki Kaisha
Honda Giken Kogyo Kabushiki Kaisha
Minato-ku, Tokyo, JP
Other trademarks owned by Honda Giken Kogyo Kabushiki Kaisha
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
SARAH BRUNO
SARAH BRUNO ARENT FOX LLP1717 K Street, NWWASHINGTON, DC 20036-5342UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 007 | Engines other than for land vehicles, namely internal combustion engines,outboard motors and structural parts therefore; electric generators; power lawn and garden tools, namely tillers and trimmers; lawn mowers; snow blowers; and pneumatic and hydraulic machines, namely dewatering pumps, construction pumps, multipurpose pumps, and submersible pumps | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Honda Giken Kogyo Kabushiki Kaisha
- Other trademarks owned by Honda Giken Kogyo Kabushiki Kaisha
- Other trademarks owned by Honda Giken Kogyo Kabushiki Kaisha
- Other trademarks in Class 007
- Similar marks named E SPEC
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 21, 2014 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Mar 11, 2013 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 11, 2013 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 14, 2007 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jul 6, 2007 | REGV | LAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jul 6, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jun 4, 2007 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| May 14, 2007 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| May 14, 2007 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| May 8, 2007 | PGTT | PETITION GRANTED - TTAB APPEAL FILED | — |
| May 7, 2007 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Apr 23, 2007 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Apr 16, 2007 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 16, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 16, 2007 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 16, 2007 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 21, 2006 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jul 21, 2006 | CNFR | SU - FINAL REFUSAL - WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jun 28, 2006 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jun 13, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 13, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 13, 2005 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 13, 2005 | CNRT | SU - NON-FINAL ACTION - WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 8, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 11, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jun 30, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 30, 2005 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 30, 2005 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Feb 24, 2005 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Feb 24, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 16, 2004 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 26, 2004 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Aug 26, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 16, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Mar 15, 2004 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 26, 2004 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Feb 26, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 26, 2003 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jun 3, 2003 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| May 14, 2003 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Feb 11, 2003 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 11, 2003 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 11, 2003 | ZZZY | PREVIOUS ACTION COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Oct 21, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 26, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 26, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 27, 2002 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jan 22, 2002 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Apr 25, 2001 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 26, 2001 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 8, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 26, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 20, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |