USPTO serial 75933620
ROK TEX
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BENZMILLER, ANDREW
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with ROK TEX?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
D-08258 Markneukirchen, DE
D-08258 Markneukirchen, DE
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Evan M. Kent
EVAN M KENT RUSS AUGUST & KABAT12424 WILSHIRE BLVD FL 12LOS ANGELES, CA 90025-1052UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 015 | PROTECTIVE BAGS AND PROTECTIVE COVERS OF NYLON MATERIAL FABRIC FOR MUSICAL INSTRUMENTS | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 31, 2004 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jan 22, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 22, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 18, 2004 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 18, 2003 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Nov 19, 2003 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Sep 23, 2003 | PCGR | PETITION TO DIRECTOR GRANTED | — |
| Jul 18, 2003 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 23, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jun 18, 2003 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Jun 3, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 27, 2003 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jan 23, 2003 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 17, 2002 | PCRC | PETITION TO DIRECTOR RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 16, 2002 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Dec 16, 2002 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jun 18, 2002 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Mar 26, 2002 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Mar 6, 2002 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Nov 26, 2001 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 26, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 3, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 28, 2001 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Aug 30, 2001 | 44DD | SEC. 44(D) CLAIM DELETED | — |
| Mar 1, 2001 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Nov 22, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 22, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 7, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 26, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |