USPTO serial 75934774
CAFE NESCAFE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- ERVIN, INGA
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with CAFE NESCAFE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Robert H. Sanders
ROBERT H SANDERS NESTLE USA INCLEGAL DEPT TRADEMARK SERVICE800 N BRAND BLVDGLENDALE, CA 91203Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 029 | Preserved, dried and cooked vegetables and fruits; jams; marmalades; milk, namely, milk substitutes and milk-based drinks; dairy products, namely, cream, butter, cheese, yogurts; protein for use as a food additive | ACTIVE | — |
| 030 | Coffee, coffee extracts and coffee-based drinks, namely, coffee beverages containing milk; coffee substitutes; extracts used as flavoring, namely, extracts of coffee substitutes; tea, tea extracts and tea-based beverages with fruit flavoring; cocoa; cocoa-based beverages; confectionery, namely, candies and toffee; chocolate; chocolate-based beverages; bakery products, pastry; custard; puddings; rice; preparations made from flour and cereals; breakfast cereals; ice cream | ACTIVE | — |
| 032 | Mineral and aerated waters and other non-alcoholic drinks; fruit and vegetable-based drinks; fruit and vegetable juices; syrups and other preparations for making non-alcoholic drinks | ACTIVE | — |
| 035 | Business management and organization; business management consultation; business management assistance and providing advisory services relating thereto; business management, namely, record keeping services in the field of foodstuffs and catering; cooperative advertising and marketing, business organization consultancy services relating to the importation of foodstuffs and of food utensils such as vending machines; business consultancy services relating to food and drink | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Restaurant, hotel, cafe, snack-bar and canteen services; catering services; quality control for others in the fields of food, nutrition and food additives | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Societe des Produits Nestle S.A.
- Other trademarks owned by Societe des Produits Nestle S.A.
- Other trademarks in Class 029
- Other trademarks in Class 030
- Other trademarks in Class 032
- Other trademarks in Class 035
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named CAFE NESCAFE
- Prosecution event ABN6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 10, 2004 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jul 27, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Feb 10, 2004 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 20, 2004 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Jan 20, 2004 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jul 17, 2003 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 17, 2003 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Jul 17, 2003 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Mar 24, 2003 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 20, 2003 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jan 20, 2003 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jul 23, 2002 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Apr 30, 2002 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Apr 10, 2002 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jan 7, 2002 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 1, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 17, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 22, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 24, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 22, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 18, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 18, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 9, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |