USPTO serial 75941060
SILA
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- GARTNER, JOHN M
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with SILA?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
SUSAN M. GOLD
SUSAN M GOLD AETHER SYSTEMS, INC11460 CRONRIDGE DROWINGS MILLS, MD 21217UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Computer hardware, computer interface boards, modems, wireline and wireless telecommunications network equipment, namely, network operation centers, routers, switches, hubs, servers, aggregators, multiplexers, remote access concentrators, desktop and handheld devices and signal generators for deploying content for web browser applications, all for use in wireless communications; software for use in messaging client and server messaging applications, namely, proprietary protocol stacks, e-mail software, voice mail software, web browser software; and computer software development tools, including software development kits for developing messaging client and server messaging applications; wireless messaging systems, namely clients, servers, routers, databases, protocol gateways and firewalls for deploying content to web browser applications | ACTIVE | — |
| 038 | Wireless communication services, namely, the provisioning of network hardware and software for providing multiple-user access to computer information networks, paging services, web browser applications, voicemail services, e-mail services | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Consulting services in the field of computer hardware, computer software, integration and telecommunications; computer software design and development services for others; design and development of wireless data network systems for others, namely, clients, servers, routers, databases, protocol gateways and firewalls for deploying content to web browser applications; technical support services, namely troubleshooting of wireless data and communications computer hardware and software problems via telephone, e-mail, voice mail, postings on a global computer network, help desks and in person | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 14, 2002 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 17, 2001 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Sep 17, 2001 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Sep 14, 2001 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 1, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 19, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |