USPTO serial 75941750
POUR BOY
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- ADKINS, CHRISTOPHER
- Law office
- TTAB
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with POUR BOY?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Martin Sachs
DANIEL V THOMPSON THOMPSON & GUSTAVSON LLP9330 LBJ FREEWAY, STE 1185DALLAS, TX 75243UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 021 | PLASTIC POURING SPOUT FOR AUTOMOTIVE LIQUIDS | ABANDONED | Aug 17, 2000 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 23, 2005 | MAB4 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Aug 23, 2005 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Aug 23, 2005 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Aug 23, 2005 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| May 14, 2004 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 8, 2002 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Nov 15, 2001 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 16, 2001 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Sep 26, 2001 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Mar 13, 2001 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 7, 2001 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Dec 20, 2000 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 12, 2000 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Sep 8, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 8, 2000 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Aug 11, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 9, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |