Drawing for DOCQUEST

USPTO serial 75942426

DOCQUEST

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 605
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
MCCAULEY, BRENDAN D
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with DOCQUEST?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

James R. Meyer

JAMES R MEYER SCHNADER HARRISON SEGAL & LEWIS LLP1600 MARKET ST STE 3600PHILADELPHIA, PA 19103UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
038electronic transmission of complex and graphic intensive technical documents, namely architectural drawings, blue prints, engineering drawings, land surveys and maps, enabling on-line collaboration to communicate, revise and approve such documents utilizing global computer networksABANDONED

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Feb 11, 2003ABN5ABANDONMENT - AFTER PUBLICATION
Dec 24, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Jun 4, 2002ETOFEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED
Apr 23, 2002PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Apr 3, 2002NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION
Nov 14, 2001CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Aug 2, 2001CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Aug 2, 2001CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Mar 5, 2001CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 2, 2000CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Aug 24, 2000CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 18, 2000DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Aug 10, 2000DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance