USPTO serial 75950769
OPTOMETRIC PHYSICIAN
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 2950413Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- May 10, 2005
- Examiner
- HAYASH, SUSAN C
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with OPTOMETRIC PHYSICIAN?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
KENNETH M. KEITH
KENNETH M KEITH666 OLD COUNTRY RDGARDEN CITY, NY 11530UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 016 | Professional trade publication in the nature of a newsletter in the field of optometry | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Jun 7, 2001 |
| 042 | Computer services, namely, providing an on-line Professional trade publication in the nature of a newsletter in the field of optometry | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Jun 7, 2001 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 21, 2012 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| May 10, 2005 | R.SR | REGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | Your mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application. |
| Feb 2, 2005 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jan 28, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jan 25, 2005 | CNTA | APPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 25, 2005 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Jan 21, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 2, 2004 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Aug 25, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 23, 2004 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 23, 2004 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 23, 2004 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 12, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 28, 2004 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 13, 2003 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Nov 12, 2003 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Nov 12, 2003 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 12, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 12, 2003 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 27, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Sep 24, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 24, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 11, 2003 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 7, 2003 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| May 19, 2003 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| May 19, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 26, 2003 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 23, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 23, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 10, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 4, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 9, 2002 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Jun 11, 2001 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| May 17, 2001 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 5, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 30, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 17, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |