USPTO serial 75975623
TEAM USA
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- COWARD, JEFFERY
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with TEAM USA?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
James L. Bikoff
JAMES L BIKOFF ARTER & HADDEN1801 K ST NW STE 400KWASHINGTON, DC 20006-1301UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 025 | clothing, namely T-shirts, polo shirts, shirts, knit shirts, jerseys and tank tops, shorts, pants, sweaters, caps, hats, scarves, visors, warm-up suits, sweatshirts, jackets, vests, uniforms, neckties, wristbands and headbands, gloves, infant cloth bibs, pajamas, toddler and infant playsuits, cloth diaper covers, rompers, overalls and creepers, socks and hosiery, belts and suspenders, aprons and chef's hats; footwear | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 30, 1997 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 27, 1997 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 3, 1997 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 3, 1997 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Jan 3, 1997 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Nov 21, 1996 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jul 16, 1996 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Jul 25, 1995 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| May 17, 1995 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 17, 1994 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 19, 1994 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 1, 1994 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |