Drawing for THE CHOICE IS CLEAR

USPTO serial 75976910

THE CHOICE IS CLEAR

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with THE CHOICE IS CLEAR?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

LYNN A TANNEHILL

LYNN A TANNEHILL LEYDIG VOIT & MAYER2 PRUDENTIAL PLZ STE 4900CHICAGO, IL 60601-6780UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
010medical vacuum systems and instruments, namely, obstetrical vacuum extraction systems comprised of vacuum pumps, vacuum lines, collection feeders, vacuum limiters, vacuum gauges, extractor cups and lids; fetal monitor kits comprised of electrical monitors, electrodes and leg platesABANDONED

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (ABN6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jun 8, 1999ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Oct 6, 1998NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jul 14, 1998PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jun 12, 1998NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION
Apr 26, 1998CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Apr 26, 1998DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Jan 24, 1998DPCCDIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE
Sep 18, 1997CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED
Jul 7, 1997CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Jan 16, 1997CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 4, 1996DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance