USPTO serial 75977031
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Martin P. Hoffman
MARTIN P HOFFMAN HOFFMAN, WASSON, & GITLER, PC2361 JEFFERSON DAVIS HWYSTE 522ARLINGTON, VA 22202| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 029 | meat substitutes; namely, meatless burger patties and rissoles | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Oct 21, 1996 |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 25, 2005 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Sep 22, 1998 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jul 20, 1998 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Mar 9, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 6, 1998 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Mar 4, 1998 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Feb 24, 1998 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 18, 1997 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 13, 1997 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 13, 1996 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Dec 6, 1996 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Aug 13, 1996 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| May 31, 1996 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Feb 22, 1996 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 1, 1995 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jun 13, 1995 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Feb 21, 1995 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Nov 29, 1994 | PETL | COMMUNICATION RECEIVED FROM PETITIONER | — |
| Nov 16, 1994 | PILM | PETITION INQUIRY LETTER ISSUED | — |
| Jul 20, 1994 | PETL | COMMUNICATION RECEIVED FROM PETITIONER | — |
| Jun 30, 1994 | PILM | PETITION INQUIRY LETTER ISSUED | — |
| Mar 18, 1994 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 1, 1993 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jan 5, 1993 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Dec 4, 1992 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Nov 3, 1992 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 30, 1992 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Sep 10, 1992 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 1, 1992 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 21, 1992 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |