USPTO serial 75978230
AIRSPORTS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MARTIN, JENNIFER MCGARRY
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with AIRSPORTS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
CHARLES T GRAHAM
PHILIP L BONDIE, PRESIDENT AIRSPORTS TECHNOLOGY, LLC2925 BRASSOW RDSALINE, MI 48176UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 028 | air pads for comfort and protection design for use in golf bag straps and handles and for incorporation in athletic protective pads and guards | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 17, 2002 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Sep 17, 2002 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Sep 17, 2002 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Mar 31, 2000 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Oct 22, 1999 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 21, 1999 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Aug 20, 1999 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| May 6, 1999 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 30, 1999 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Feb 12, 1999 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jan 4, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 4, 1999 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 4, 1999 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 30, 1998 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 10, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |