USPTO serial 75978442
AROMONT DEMI-GLACE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Oct 5, 1999
- Examiner
- PAPPAS, MATTHEW
- Law office
- SCANNING ON DEMAND
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with AROMONT DEMI-GLACE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
F-02340 Montcornet, FR
F-02340 Montcornet, FR
F-02340 Montcornet, FR
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
MARIA A SAVIO
MARIA A SAVIO GOTTLIEB RACKMAN & REISMAN PC270 MADISON AVENEW YORK, NY 10016-0601UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 029 | broth, stocks, soups, concentrated vegetables | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | May 12, 1998 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 30, 2006 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jul 15, 2006 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Oct 5, 1999 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jul 15, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 6, 1999 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Jun 23, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 15, 1999 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jun 11, 1999 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Apr 7, 1999 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Oct 20, 1998 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jul 28, 1998 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 26, 1998 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| May 8, 1998 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 9, 1998 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 29, 1997 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 23, 1997 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 19, 1997 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 17, 1997 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 14, 1997 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 14, 1997 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 12, 1997 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 24, 1996 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |