Drawing for THE RESERVE

USPTO serial 75978555

THE RESERVE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
FIRST, VIVIAN M
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with THE RESERVE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

LESTER K ESSIG

LESTER K ESSIG RAY QUINNEY & NEBEKER400 DESERET BLDG 79 S MAIN STP O BOX 45385SALT LAKE CITY, UT 84145-0385

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
041providing casino facilitiesACTIVE

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Feb 20, 2002EXFBEXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF
Oct 2, 2001ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL
Oct 2, 2001EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED
Jul 27, 2001CNCFCONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED
Jul 26, 2001ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN
Jul 23, 2001CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Jun 13, 2001JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY
Jun 12, 2001EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED
Dec 10, 1999CNCFCONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED
Jul 17, 1999DPCCDIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE
May 25, 1999EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED
Mar 11, 1999DRRRDIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED
Mar 11, 1999CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Mar 11, 1999CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Sep 11, 1998CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Feb 20, 1998UNPRUNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED
Mar 26, 1997CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED
Feb 10, 1997CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Jun 26, 1996CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 20, 1996DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance