USPTO serial 75978555
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
LESTER K ESSIG
LESTER K ESSIG RAY QUINNEY & NEBEKER400 DESERET BLDG 79 S MAIN STP O BOX 45385SALT LAKE CITY, UT 84145-0385| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 041 | providing casino facilities | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 20, 2002 | EXFB | EXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF | — |
| Oct 2, 2001 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Oct 2, 2001 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Jul 27, 2001 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Jul 26, 2001 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Jul 23, 2001 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 13, 2001 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Jun 12, 2001 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Dec 10, 1999 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Jul 17, 1999 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| May 25, 1999 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Mar 11, 1999 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 11, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 11, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 11, 1998 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Feb 20, 1998 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 26, 1997 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Feb 10, 1997 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 26, 1996 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 20, 1996 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |