USPTO serial 75979193
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
London, GB
LONDON, GB
DREAMWORKS DISTRIBUTION LIMITED
LONDON, GB
London, GB
London, GB
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Lawrence E. Apolzon
Lawrence E. Apolzon Fross Zelnick Lehrman & Zissu, P.C.866 United Nations PlazaNew York, NY 10017UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 028 | games and playthings, namely, soft-sculpture toys, jigsaw puzzles, manipulative puzzles, cube puzzles, baby rattles, infants' rattles, mobiles, mechanical toys, electric action toys, stuffed toy animals, toy figures, dolls, doll dresses and accessories for dolls, card games, toy vehicles, toy construction sets, puppets, Christmas tree decorations, except confectionery or illumination articles; gymnastic apparatus; sporting articles, namely-- sport balls; tennis, squash, badminton, racquetball, paddle ball and table tennis rackets and racket covers; baseball and softball mitts, gloves, bats, masks, leg protectors, cups, pads, bases; soccer pads; football pads, tees; field hockey and lacrosse sticks, pads; mouth protectors; archery bows, strings, arrows, targets, quivers; basketball goals, basketball nets, basketball backboards; croquet sets; boxing gloves; barbells; skis, ski poles; snowboards; goggles for skiing, swimming, racket sports, sledding; bowling balls; golf clubs, bags, tees, gloves, ball markers, club head covers, ball mark repair tools; ice hockey sticks and pucks; shuffleboard sticks; shuttlecocks; volleyball, tennis, table tennis nets; rugby pads; cricket sticks, pads, wickets; sleds; surfboards; boogie boards; skim boards; windsurfing boards; ice skates; roller skates; in-line skates; skate boards; stationary exercise bicycles; flying discs; water skis; dart boards; darts; swim masks and fins; snorkels; fishing rods, reels, lures; nose plugs for swimming | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 19, 2015 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Aug 5, 2015 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Aug 2, 2013 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Aug 22, 2012 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Aug 15, 2012 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Aug 31, 2011 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 31, 2011 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 29, 2010 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 10, 2008 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Sep 8, 2008 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 8, 2008 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| May 15, 2008 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 15, 2008 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 26, 2006 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Oct 10, 2006 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Sep 20, 2006 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Aug 30, 2006 | ATRV | ATTORNEY REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Aug 29, 2006 | ADBS | 1(B) BASIS DELETED; NEW BASIS REQUESTED | — |
| Aug 9, 2006 | PCBG | PETITION TO DIRECTOR - CHANGE BASIS - GRANTED | — |
| Jul 27, 2006 | IUCN | NOTICE OF ALLOWANCE CANCELLED | — |
| Jul 27, 2006 | PDCB | PETITION TO DIRECTOR - CHANGE BASIS - RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 27, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 17, 2006 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 30, 2006 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jan 29, 2006 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Jul 29, 2005 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 29, 2005 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Jul 29, 2005 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jun 29, 2005 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 29, 2005 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 8, 2005 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 21, 2005 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Jan 21, 2005 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Aug 20, 2004 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 5, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jul 27, 2004 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Jul 27, 2004 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Feb 13, 2004 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 28, 2004 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jan 28, 2004 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Oct 22, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 29, 2003 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jun 9, 2003 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| May 6, 2003 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Apr 16, 2003 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Mar 12, 2003 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 10, 2003 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Mar 5, 2003 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 19, 2003 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Dec 21, 2002 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 28, 2002 | 44ED | SEC. 44(E) CLAIM DELETED | — |
| Oct 28, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 28, 2002 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 24, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 24, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 18, 2002 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Sep 10, 2002 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 31, 2002 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 31, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 30, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 28, 2002 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 5, 2001 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jul 18, 2000 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jun 21, 2000 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Mar 25, 2000 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jul 8, 1999 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 8, 1999 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 14, 1999 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Jun 14, 1999 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Nov 9, 1998 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Sep 14, 1998 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 12, 1998 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 10, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 25, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |