USPTO serial 75979585
PEAPOD PACKAGES
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MADDEN, ANNE
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with PEAPOD PACKAGES?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Paula J. Krasny
PAULA J KRASNY BAKER & MCKENZIE1 PRUDENTIAL PLZ STE 3500130 E RANDOLPH DRCHICAGO, IL 60601Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | ONLINE ORDERING SERVICES FEATURING A WIDE VARIETY OF CONSUMER GOODS; ONLINE SERVICES IN THE NATURE OF DISSEMINATION OF ADVERTISEMENTS AND PROMOTIONS FOR OTHERS IN THE FIELD OF SHOPPING FOR CONSUMER GOODS AND RELATED CONSUMER INFORMATION VIA ONLINE ELECTRONIC COMMUNICATIONS AND MULTI-USER GLOBAL COMMUNICATIONS NETWORKS; MARKET RESEARCH AND ANALYSIS SERVICES FOR OTHERS, PROVIDING INFORMATION RELATING TO ONLINE ORDERING OF A WIDE VARIETY OF CONSUMER GOODS VIA ONLINE ELECTRONIC COMMUNICATIONS AND MULTI-USER GLOBAL COMPUTER NETWORKS | ACTIVE | Oct 4, 1999 |
| 039 | DELIVERY SERVICES RENDERED VIA A SHIPPING CARRIER IN THE FIELDS OF A WIDE VARIETY OF PERSONAL CONSUMER GOODS AND OTHER HOUSEHOLD RELATED GOODS | ACTIVE | Oct 4, 1999 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 15, 2003 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| May 10, 2003 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 20, 2003 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Mar 20, 2003 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Oct 24, 2002 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 11, 2002 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Sep 11, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 23, 2002 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jan 29, 2002 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jan 9, 2002 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Sep 24, 2001 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 23, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 14, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 13, 2000 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Sep 22, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 12, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 15, 2000 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Apr 29, 2000 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Nov 22, 1999 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Jun 1, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 1, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 30, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |