USPTO serial 75979911
YOW
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- GOODMAN, WENDY BETH
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with YOW?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Susan Loring Crane
SUSAN LORING CRANE BROWN RAYSMAN MILLSTEINFELDER & STEINER LLP120 W 45TH STNEW YORK, NY 10036Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | COMPUTER SOFTWARE FOR USE IN RETRIEVING AND BROWSING CONTENT AVAILABLE ON A GLOBAL COMPUTER NETWORK, AND FOR ENABLING COMMUNICATIONS OVER A GLOBAL COMPUTER NETWORK; COMPUTER SOFTWARE FOR USE BY CHILDREN | ACTIVE | Sep 24, 1999 |
| 042 | PROVIDING MULTIPLE USER ACCESS TO GLOBAL COMPUTER NETWORK WEB CONTENT AND OTHER DIGITAL CONTENT FEATURING TOPICS OF INTEREST TO CHILDREN AND PARENTS | ACTIVE | Sep 24, 1999 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 8, 2001 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 23, 2000 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Aug 17, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 17, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 22, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 14, 2000 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| May 15, 2000 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| May 15, 2000 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Apr 17, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |