USPTO serial 75980601
HOCKEY.COM
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 2809538Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jan 27, 2004
- Examiner
- BUONGIORNO, CHRISTOPHER L
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with HOCKEY.COM?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
FLINT, MI
DOVER, NH
COLUMBIA, MO
Manchester, NH
FLINT, MI
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Thomas E. Anderson
THOMAS E ANDERSON GIFFORD, KRASS, GROH, SPRINKLE, ET ALPO BOX 70212701 TROY CTR DR STE 330TROY, MI 48007-7021Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | Retail services, namely, retail store services in the field of hockey equipment, clothing and other accessories and tickets to hockey games | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Nov 30, 1999 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by PERANI, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by PHILBRICK, DANIEL J.
- Other trademarks owned by NULL, BRIAN
- Other trademarks owned by Hockey.Com, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by PERANI, INC.
- Other trademarks in Class 035
- Similar marks named HOCKEY.COM
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 3, 2010 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Jun 24, 2009 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Jun 22, 2005 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 27, 2004 | R.SR | REGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | Your mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application. |
| Dec 1, 2003 | CNTA | APPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 1, 2003 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Oct 7, 2003 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jul 3, 2003 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Jun 27, 2003 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Jun 27, 2003 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Jun 21, 2003 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Jun 5, 2003 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| May 8, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Mar 31, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 31, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 28, 2002 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Oct 24, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 1, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 19, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 18, 2002 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Jun 24, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 20, 2002 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Jun 20, 2002 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 20, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 16, 2002 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 16, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 11, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 9, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 7, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 1, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 11, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 30, 2001 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Dec 18, 2000 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 18, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 16, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 6, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |