USPTO serial 75980696
WORKFLOW MANAGEMENT
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Dec 18, 2001
- Examiner
- TOLPIN, BRETT
- Law office
- POST REGISTRATION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with WORKFLOW MANAGEMENT?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
FLEET MANAGEMENT, AS COLLATERAL AGENT
BOSTON, MA
Other trademarks owned by FLEET MANAGEMENT, AS COLLATERAL AGENT
FLEET MANAGEMENT, AS COLLATERAL AGENT
BOSTON, MA
Other trademarks owned by FLEET MANAGEMENT, AS COLLATERAL AGENT
Palm Beach, FL
FLEET MANAGEMENT, AS COLLATERAL AGENT
BOSTON, MA
Other trademarks owned by FLEET MANAGEMENT, AS COLLATERAL AGENT
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
ROBERT E. SMARTSCHAN
ROBERT E. SMARTSCHAN KAUFMAN & CANOLES150 WEST MAIN STREETSUITE 2100NORFOLK, VA 23510Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 040 | Pattern printing ; Photographic printing | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Jun 5, 1998 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by FLEET MANAGEMENT, AS COLLATERAL AGENT
- Other trademarks owned by FLEET MANAGEMENT, AS COLLATERAL AGENT
- Other trademarks owned by Workflow Management, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by FLEET MANAGEMENT, AS COLLATERAL AGENT
- Other trademarks in Class 040
- Similar marks named WORKFLOW MANAGEMENT
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 11, 2013 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Jul 20, 2012 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Mar 16, 2011 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Apr 8, 2009 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Nov 5, 2008 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Nov 5, 2008 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| May 5, 2008 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Apr 29, 2008 | PLGL | ASSIGNED TO PARALEGAL | — |
| Apr 14, 2008 | E815 | TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 2, 2007 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Dec 18, 2001 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Sep 25, 2001 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Sep 5, 2001 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jul 10, 2001 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 10, 2001 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Apr 21, 2001 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Feb 9, 2001 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 10, 2000 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Dec 10, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 6, 2000 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Oct 11, 2000 | IURF | IU INFORMAL RESPONSE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 11, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 3, 2000 | IUFF | USE AFFIDAVIT FAILED FORMALITIES | — |
| Jun 12, 2000 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Jun 12, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 14, 1999 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Aug 3, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 4, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 21, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 8, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |