USPTO serial 75980812
PEER PERSPECTIVES
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BORSUK, ESTHER
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with PEER PERSPECTIVES?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
LAWRENCE D. ROSS
LAWRENCE D ROSS BRESSLER AMERY & ROSS PC325 COLUMBIA TPKE STE 301FLORHAM PARK, NJ 07932-1235UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | prerecorded computer discs, prerecorded audio tapes, prerecorded video tapes, DVDs and compact discs, all featuring articles and information relating to issues in dentistry and medicine | ACTIVE | Dec 1, 1999 |
| 016 | magazines, booklets, brochures and newsletters, all concerning issues in dentistry and medicine | ACTIVE | Jan 31, 2000 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 24, 2002 | ABN0 | ABANDONMENT - INCOMPLETE RESPONSE | — |
| Sep 20, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 20, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 19, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 26, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 24, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 26, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 20, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 11, 2001 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| May 10, 2001 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Mar 14, 2001 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Mar 14, 2001 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 27, 2000 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 13, 2000 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Mar 14, 2000 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Dec 21, 1999 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Nov 19, 1999 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Sep 15, 1999 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 13, 1999 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Aug 2, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |