USPTO serial 75981489
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
DK-3460 Birkerod, DK
DK-3460 Birkerod, DK
DK-3460 Birkerod, DK
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Gordon E. Gray
JOHN CASTELLANO HARNESS, DICKEY & PIERCE, PLC11730 PLZ AMERICA DR STE 600RESTON, VA 20190UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 006 | Metal valve connectors for use in connecting a pressure source to valves of tires for vehicles | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
| 007 | Valve connectors for use as components of pumps and other pressure sources which are primarily for inflating bicycle tires as well as other vehicle tires, and for use as components of pumps and other pressure sources in the nature of on-board vehicle accessories for inflating tires of vehicles, namely, valve connectors for use in connecting the pressure source to the tire valves | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
| 020 | Plastic valve connectors for use in connecting a pressure source to valves of tires for vehicles | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 16, 2009 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Jan 24, 2008 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Sep 30, 2006 | CORV | REVIEW OF CORRESPONDENCE COMPLETE | — |
| Jun 7, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 2, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 9, 2004 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 17, 2002 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jun 25, 2002 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 5, 2002 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Feb 28, 2002 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 22, 2002 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Sep 29, 2001 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jul 9, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 5, 2001 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Oct 16, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 11, 2000 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Nov 22, 1999 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| May 20, 1999 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 25, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 29, 1998 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 27, 1998 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 4, 1997 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 27, 1997 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 5, 1997 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 18, 1997 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 18, 1997 | 1.BD | Sec. 1(B) CLAIM DELETED | — |
| Jan 29, 1997 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 14, 1997 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |