USPTO serial 75981682
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
SUNNYVALE, CA
HALLANDALE, FL
SUNNYVALE, CA
San Jose, CA
KING OF PRUSSIA, PA
SUNNYVALE, CA
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Marla R. Milgram
MARLA R MILGRAM PEPPER HAMILTON LLP18TH & ARCH STS3000 TWO LOGAN SQPHILADELPHIA, PA 19103-2799| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | on-line retail services featuring a full line of computer software and accompanying manuals, music, books, computer hardware, computer peripherals, printers, CPUs, and audio and video products, cassettes, CD-ROMs, and DVDs; on-line ordering services featuring a full line of computer software and accompanying manuals, music, books, computer hardware, computer peripherals, printers, CPUs, and audio and video products, cassettes, CD-ROMs, and DVDs | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Aug 24, 1998 |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 16, 2009 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Jan 15, 2008 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Sep 6, 2007 | CCON | COUNTERCLAIM OPP. NO. 999999 | — |
| Jan 19, 2006 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 19, 2006 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 19, 2005 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 19, 2005 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 3, 2002 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jun 11, 2002 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| May 22, 2002 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Feb 26, 2002 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 26, 2002 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Nov 17, 2001 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Aug 14, 2001 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 15, 2001 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Dec 10, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 30, 1999 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| May 11, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 11, 1999 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| May 11, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 4, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 5, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 15, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 12, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |