USPTO serial 75981912
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
ROBIN LIGHTNER MAISASHVILI
ROBIN LIGHTNER MAISASHVILI BAKER BOTTS LLP1 SHELL PLZ910 LOUISIANA STHOUSTON, TX 77002-4995| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | downloadable electronic publications in the nature of books, magazines, journals, newspapers, periodicals, newsletters, supplements, brochures, directories, and pamphlets, all featuring information and advice relating to recruitment, careers, training, industry profiles, benefits, personal lifestyle issues, executive search and selection, placement services, job and employment vacancies, interview techniques and curriculum vitae drafting; electronic publications, namely, books, magazines, journals, newspapers, periodicals, newsletters, supplements, brochures, directories, and pamphlets, all featuring information and advice relating to recruitment, careers, training, industry profiles, benefits, personal lifestyle issues, executive search and selection, placement services, job and employment vacancies, interview techniques and curriculum vitae drafting recorded on cassettes, video cassettes, tapes, CD-ROMs and DVDs | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 4, 2005 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 4, 2005 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 3, 2004 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Apr 23, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Sep 26, 2002 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Sep 19, 2002 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Mar 22, 2002 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jan 26, 2002 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Sep 24, 2001 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 22, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 15, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |