USPTO serial 75982212
XHALE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jun 24, 2003
- Examiner
- ISAACSON, GINNY
- Law office
- SCANNING ON DEMAND
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with XHALE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
WHITE KNIGHT ENGINEERED PRODUCTS, INC.
CHARLOTTE, NC
Other trademarks owned by WHITE KNIGHT ENGINEERED PRODUCTS, INC.
Greensboro, NC
Greensboro, NC
Greensboro, NC
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
C Robert Rhodes
C ROBERT RHODES WOMBLE CARLYLE SANDRIDGE & RICEPO BOX 7037ATLANTA, GA 30357-0037UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 024 | POLYESTER KNIT FABRIC HAVING MOISTURE WICKING PROPERTIES FOR USE IN UNIFORM SHIRTS AND CAMOUFLAGE PRINTED SHIRTS | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Oct 18, 2002 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by WHITE KNIGHT ENGINEERED PRODUCTS, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by Intex Corporation
- Other trademarks owned by Intex Corporation
- Other trademarks owned by Intex Corporation
- Other trademarks in Class 024
- Similar marks named XHALE
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 31, 2010 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Jun 12, 2008 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Sep 14, 2006 | CORV | REVIEW OF CORRESPONDENCE COMPLETE | — |
| Sep 27, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 17, 2003 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 24, 2003 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| May 1, 2003 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Apr 29, 2003 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Mar 24, 2003 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Mar 24, 2003 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| Oct 1, 2002 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jul 9, 2002 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 19, 2002 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Apr 15, 2002 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 6, 2002 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jan 31, 2002 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 4, 2001 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Nov 21, 2001 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Nov 1, 2001 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 21, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 21, 2001 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 15, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 10, 2000 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| May 30, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 28, 2000 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jan 24, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 6, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |