USPTO serial 75982649
TH JEFFERSON
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- ELTON, DAVID JONATHAN
- Law office
- TTAB
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with TH JEFFERSON?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
THOMAS JEFFERSON FOUNDATION, INC.
CHARLOTTESVILLE, VA
THOMAS JEFFERSON FOUNDATION, INC.
CHARLOTTESVILLE, VA
Thomas Jefferson Memorial Foundation, Inc.
Charlottesville, VA
Other trademarks owned by Thomas Jefferson Memorial Foundation, Inc.
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
MARY DALTON BARIL
MARY DALTON BARIL MCGUIRE WOODS BATTLE & BOOTHEONE JAMES CTR 901 E CARY STRICHMOND, VA 23219-4030UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 033 | wine distributed exclusively through Thomas Jefferson Foundation, Inc and its gift shops, web sites and catalogues | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by THOMAS JEFFERSON FOUNDATION, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by THOMAS JEFFERSON FOUNDATION, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by Thomas Jefferson Memorial Foundation, Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 033
- Similar marks named TH JEFFERSON
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 27, 2005 | MAB4 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Jul 27, 2005 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Jul 27, 2005 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jul 27, 2005 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Apr 26, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 1, 2003 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Aug 19, 2003 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 15, 2003 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 25, 2003 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| May 14, 2003 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 17, 2003 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Jun 27, 2002 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jun 10, 2002 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Mar 15, 2002 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 15, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 27, 2001 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| May 2, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 15, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 7, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 28, 2000 | PCRC | PETITION TO DIRECTOR RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 24, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 18, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 2, 1998 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Oct 14, 1997 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 25, 1997 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 14, 1997 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 4, 1997 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 3, 1997 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |