USPTO serial 75982803
BROOKLYN CYCLONES
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SAITO, KIM
- Law office
- TTAB
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with BROOKLYN CYCLONES?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Albert Robin
ALBERT ROBIN Cowan Liebowitz & Latman, PC1133 Avenue of the AmericasNEW YORK, NY 10036-6799UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 024 | Cloth pennants supporting a minor league professional baseball team | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 9, 2007 | MAB4 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Aug 9, 2007 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Aug 9, 2007 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Aug 25, 2004 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 21, 2004 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jun 16, 2004 | OPPF | OPPOSITION PAPERS RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| May 11, 2004 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Apr 21, 2004 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Feb 27, 2004 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 16, 2004 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Dec 12, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Oct 29, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 29, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 16, 2003 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 3, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 14, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 7, 2002 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jul 31, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 15, 2002 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 15, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 15, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 8, 2002 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jan 31, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 14, 2001 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Sep 19, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 19, 2001 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 4, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 30, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |