USPTO serial 75983568
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
IBERIA, Lineas Aereas de Espana, S.A.
28006 Madrid, ES
Other trademarks owned by IBERIA, Lineas Aereas de Espana, S.A.
IBERIA LINEAS AEREAS DE ESPANA SOCIEDAD ANONIMA OPERADORA
MADRID, ES
Other trademarks owned by IBERIA LINEAS AEREAS DE ESPANA SOCIEDAD ANONIMA OPERADORA
IBERIA, Lineas Aereas de Espana, S.A.
28006 Madrid, ES
Other trademarks owned by IBERIA, Lineas Aereas de Espana, S.A.
IBERIA, Lineas Aereas de Espana, S.A.
28006 Madrid, ES
Other trademarks owned by IBERIA, Lineas Aereas de Espana, S.A.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Keith J. Swedo
Keith J. Swedo Bingham Greenebaum Doll LLP10 W. Market St.Suite 2700Indianapolis, IN 46204| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 039 | AIRLINE TRANSPORT SERVICES, NAMELY, TRANSPORTATION OF PASSENGERS AND GOODS BY AIR | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 24, 2016 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| May 27, 2014 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 8, 2011 | NAS8 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 - MAILED | — |
| Dec 8, 2011 | 8.OK | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED | The USPTO accepted your Section 8 declaration showing the mark is still in use in commerce (or excusable nonuse). This satisfies the six-year maintenance requirement and keeps the registration active until the next renewal deadline. |
| Dec 8, 2011 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Nov 21, 2011 | ES8R | TEAS SECTION 8 RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 10, 2011 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Nov 22, 2005 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Sep 14, 2005 | DP1B | 1(B) BASIS DELETED; PROCEED TO REGISTRATION | — |
| Sep 13, 2005 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Sep 6, 2005 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 6, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 1, 2005 | IUCN | NOTICE OF ALLOWANCE CANCELLED | — |
| Mar 1, 2005 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Sep 14, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| May 25, 2004 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| May 25, 2004 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| May 25, 2004 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Feb 6, 2003 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Nov 5, 2002 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Oct 16, 2002 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Sep 24, 2001 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 19, 2001 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Aug 27, 2001 | EXPR | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL REVERSED | — |
| May 21, 2001 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED | — |
| Mar 21, 2001 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Jan 9, 2001 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Nov 2, 2000 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Nov 1, 2000 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Apr 10, 2000 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Feb 7, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 8, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 30, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 23, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 17, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |