USPTO serial 76002445
NETSECURE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3131501Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Aug 22, 2006
- Examiner
- LOUGHRAN, BARBARA
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with NETSECURE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Huntington Beach, CA
Huntington Beach, CA
Huntington Beach, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
IRVING KESCHNER,
LAW OFFICES OF IRVING KESCHNER21535 HAWTHORNE BLVDSTE 385TORRANCE, CA 90503Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | Computer network security consultation services, namely, providing computer network security consulting; and computer security service, namely restricting access to and by computer networks to and of undesired web sites, media and individuals and facilities | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Nov 2, 1999 |
| 045 | Monitoring of computer systems for security purposes, namely, providing remote and on-site monitoring of computer network connection, security systems, firewalls, and detection systems to prevent unauthorized intrusion and security breaches | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Nov 2, 1999 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Thor Solutions, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Thor Solutions, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Thor Solutions, Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Other trademarks in Class 045
- Similar marks named NETSECURE
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 29, 2013 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Aug 22, 2006 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jun 30, 2006 | ETOP | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE PROCESS - TERMINATED | — |
| Mar 13, 2006 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 14, 2006 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jan 25, 2006 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jan 4, 2006 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Dec 30, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Dec 27, 2005 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 7, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Dec 5, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Nov 28, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 28, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 17, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 17, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 10, 2005 | CPRA | PRIORITY ACTION MAILED | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Nov 9, 2005 | CPRA | PRIORITY ACTION WRITTEN | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Oct 19, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Oct 7, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 7, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 20, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 19, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 28, 2005 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Dec 3, 2004 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Apr 18, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Apr 18, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Aug 8, 2002 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| May 9, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 8, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 8, 2002 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Sep 7, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 7, 2001 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 12, 2001 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 12, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 24, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 7, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 15, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 13, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |