USPTO serial 76002949
ESENSE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- KAZAZIAN, MICHAEL H
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 113 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with ESENSE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Atlanta, GA
Atlanta, GA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
FRANK S BENJAMIN
FRANK S BENJAMIN MCKENNA LONG & ALDRIDGE LLPSTE 5300303 PEACHTREE ST NEATLANTA, GA 30308Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | COMPUTER SOFTWARE FOR MANAGING AND FACILITATING SALES AND MARKETING EFFORTS FOR BUSINESSES AND FOR DISSEMINATING INFORMATION IN THE FIELDS OF SALES AND MARKETING | ACTIVE | Mar 1, 2000 |
| 035 | PROVIDING INFORMATION VIA WEBSITES ON INTRANETS, EXTRANETS AND THE INTERNET, IN THE FIELDS OF SALES AND MARKETING; PROVIDING INFORMATION IN THE FIELD OF BUSINESS NETWORKING AND SALES AND MARKETING; PROMOTING THE GOODS AND SERVICES OF OTHERS BY PROVIDING A WEB SITE AT WHICH USERS CAN LINK TO THE WEB SITES OF OTHERS | ACTIVE | Mar 1, 2000 |
| 041 | COMPUTER EDUCATION TRAINING SERVICES; TRAINING IN THE USE AND OPERATION OF COMPUTER SOFTWARE USED FOR CONDUCTING ONLINE MARKETING AND SALES | ACTIVE | Mar 1, 2000 |
| 042 | PROVIDING TEMPORARY USE OF ON-LINE NON-DOWNLOADABLE SOFTWARE FOR MANAGING AND FACILITATING SALES AND MARKETING EFFORTS FOR BUSINESSES; AND PROVIDING TECHNICAL SUPPORT SERVICES NAMELY, TROUBLE SHOOTING OF COMPUTER HARDWARE AND SOFTWARE PROBLEMS VIA TELEPHONE, EMAIL AND WEBSITES, IN THE FIELDS OF SALES AND MARKETING TO BUSINESSES | ACTIVE | Mar 1, 2000 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by NSE, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by NSE, Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 035
- Other trademarks in Class 041
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named ESENSE
- Prosecution event MAB2 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 8, 2005 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 8, 2005 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 12, 2004 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 28, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 26, 2004 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jul 26, 2004 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 13, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jul 1, 2004 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Jul 1, 2004 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Jul 1, 2004 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| Jul 1, 2004 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jan 28, 2004 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 26, 2004 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 5, 2004 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jan 5, 2004 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jul 8, 2003 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Apr 15, 2003 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Mar 26, 2003 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Feb 4, 2003 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 31, 2003 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 7, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 22, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 18, 2001 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jun 27, 2001 | 1.BA | Sec. 1(B) CLAIM ADDED | — |
| Apr 23, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 23, 2001 | 1.AD | SEC. 1(A) CLAIM DELETED | — |
| Oct 19, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 8, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 1, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |