USPTO serial 76003399
PROVIEW
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 2739440Status 713
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jul 22, 2003
- Examiner
- CHISOLM, KEVON
- Law office
- TTAB
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with PROVIEW?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
City of Industry, CA
City of Industry, CA
City of Industry, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
LUCY B. ARANT
John W. Montgomery Osha Liang LLPTwo Houston Center909 Fannin StreetHouston, TX 77010Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Computer monitors, LCD flat screen monitors and computer peripherals, namely, mouses, keyboards, multimedia speakers, microphones, cameras, modems, power supplies, scanners, floppy disk drivers, hard disk drivers, blank CD ROMS and DVD ROMS, joysticks, network hubs, network repeaters, touch screens, CPU fans, monitors and printers, computer interface cards, namely, videographic adapter cards, video modem cards, and memory cards, I/O cards, network LAN cards, modem cards, and memory cards; computers, notebook computers, video cassette players, DVD players, video game machines for use with televisions, telephones, portable phones and radio pagers | SECTION 18 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 4, 2009 | C18. | CANCELLED SECTION 18-TOTAL | — |
| Jun 4, 2009 | CANT | CANCELLATION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Mar 5, 2009 | CANG | CANCELLATION GRANTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Oct 1, 2008 | PETC | CANCELLATION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Dec 17, 2007 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jul 22, 2003 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Apr 29, 2003 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Apr 9, 2003 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Feb 27, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 14, 2003 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 13, 2003 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Jan 24, 2003 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 3, 2003 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Oct 18, 2002 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 30, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 30, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 26, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 15, 2002 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Dec 26, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 19, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 22, 2001 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 19, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 18, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 6, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 1, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |