USPTO serial 76006087
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Michael A. Grow
MICHAEL A GROW ARENT FOX KINTNER PLOTKIN & KAHN PLLC1050 CONNECTICUT AVE NWWASHINGTON, DC 20036UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | RETAIL APPAREL STORE SERVICES; RETAIL DEPARTMENT STORE SERVICES; ARRANGING AND CONDUCTING TRADE SHOWS IN THE FIELD OF FASHION, CLOTHING, HANDBAGS, JEWELRY AND COSMETICS; AND COMPUTERIZED ONLINE ORDERING AND RETAIL STORE SERVICES IN THE FIELD OF FASHION, CLOTHING, HANDBAGS, JEWELRY AND COSMETICS; DISSEMINATION OF ADVERTISING FOR OTHERS VIA AN ONLINE ELECTRONIC COMMUNICATIONS NETWORK; MAIL ORDER CATALOG SERVICES FEATURING CLOTHING, SHOES, HANDBAGS, JEWELRY AND COSMETICS; AND PROMOTING THE GOODS AND SERVICE OF OTHERS THROUGH THE DISTRIBUTION OF PRINTED MATERIAL AND PROMOTIONAL CONTESTS | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | LICENSING OF INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY RIGHTS NAMELY, LICENSING OF TRADEMARKS DISPLAYED ON STORE SIGNS IN CONNECTION WITH RETAIL STORES IN THE FIELD OF FASHION; LICENSING OF TRADE DRESS EMBODIED IN DESIGNS RELATING TO LAYOUTS, DECORS AND DECORATIONS, BOTH INTERIOR AND EXTERIOR, FOR RETAIL STORES IN THE FIELD OF FASHION; LICENSING OF COPYRIGHTS FOR ADVERTISING, MARKETING, PROMOTIONAL AND PUBLICITY MATERIALS INCLUDING FOR PHOTOGRAPHS USED IN CONNECTION WITH RETAIL STORES IN THE FIELD OF FASHION | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 10, 2005 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jun 10, 2005 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Sep 7, 2004 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 19, 2004 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Aug 19, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 21, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Mar 19, 2004 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 4, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 3, 2004 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Sep 30, 2003 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 5, 2003 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Sep 5, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 19, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 14, 2003 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 14, 2003 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Oct 23, 2002 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 12, 2002 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Sep 12, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 12, 2002 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Dec 18, 2001 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Nov 28, 2001 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Aug 6, 2001 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 2, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 12, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 11, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 28, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |