USPTO serial 76006779
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Santa Monica, CA
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Daniel O'Connell Offner
DANIEL OCONNELL OFFNER OFFNER & ANDERSON PC2049 CENTURY PARK E STE 2450LOS ANGELES, CA 90067UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 016 | Paper goods and printed matter, namely, posters, stickers and publications, namely, programs and brochures in the field of children's learning activities; blueprints; cardboard containers; catalogs in the field of children's learning activities and goods; decorative rubber stamps; diaries; printed invitations; original artwork, namely, posters, pictures, etches, and prints; paper name badges; paper table cloths; paper party decorations; paper napkins; paper ribbons; paper party bags; paper party hats; postercards; gift package decorations made of paper; stickers; sticker books; playing cards; and sheet music | ACTIVE | Jul 22, 1992 |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 11, 2003 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| May 22, 2002 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| May 2, 2002 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| May 2, 2002 | EXFB | EXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF | — |
| Feb 7, 2002 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Jan 10, 2002 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Jun 12, 2001 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 9, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 14, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 12, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 8, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |