Drawing for BRIGHT CHILD

USPTO serial 76006787

BRIGHT CHILD

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 601
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
MATTHEWS, AMOS
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with BRIGHT CHILD?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Daniel O'Connell Offner

DANIEL OCONNELL OFFNER OFFNER & ANDERSON PC2049 CENTURY PARK E STE 2450LOS ANGELES, CA 90067UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
041Entertainment and education services relating to children's learning activities, namely in person physical education, learning and activity center services for pre-school and primary age children in the form of an indoor activity center with different play areas and play equipment for children supervised by adults and the children's parents; in person educational classes and seminars for parents and their children in the field of children's learning activities held in activity rooms in the indoor activity centerACTIVEJul 22, 1992

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Aug 11, 2003TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED
Mar 19, 2002ABN1ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED
Mar 8, 2002EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED
Jan 10, 2002EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED
Jun 14, 2001CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Mar 9, 2001CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Sep 11, 2000CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 5, 2000DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Aug 29, 2000DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance