USPTO serial 76008977
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Arley, Coventry CV7 8HN, GB
Arley, Coventry CV7 8HN, GB
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Lawrence D. Mandel
LAWRENCE D MANDEL KLAUBER & JACKSON411 HACKENSACK AVEHACKENSACK, NJ 07601UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | (Based on Intent to Use) ADVERTISING, NAMELY, ADVERTISING OF DISPLAYS AND EXHIBITIONS, MUSEUMS, CONFERENCES, MEETINGS AND VISITOR CENTERS FOR OTHERS; BUSINESS MANAGEMENT; BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION AND OFFICE FUNCTION SERVICES, NAMELY, THE MANAGEMENT AND ORGANIZATION OF DISPLAYS AND EXHIBITIONS, MUSEUMS, CONFERENCES, MEETINGS AND VISITOR CENTERS | ACTIVE | — |
| 037 | (Based on Intent to Use) and (Based on 44(e)) BUILDING CONSTRUCTION REPAIR SERVICES; INSTALLATION OF DISPLAYS, EXHIBITIONS, MUSEUMS, CONFERENCES, MEETINGS AND VISITOR CENTERS; INSTALLATION OF EXHIBITION STANDS AND INTERIOR FITTINGS FOR EXHIBITIONS, MUSEUMS, CONFERENCES, MEETINGS AND VISITOR CENTERS | ACTIVE | — |
| 041 | (Based on Intent to Use) and (Based on 44(e)) EDUCATION SERVICES, NAMELY, CONDUCTING TRAINING PROGRAMS IN THE FIELDS OF EXHIBITIONS, MUSEUMS, CONFERENCES, MEETINGS AND VISITOR CENTERS AND IN THE MOTOR INDUSTRY; CONDUCTING SEMINARS, CONFERENCES AND WORKSHOPS FOR AND ON BEHALF OF THIRD PARTIES AND PROVIDING CONFERENCE FACILITIES FOR AND ON BEHALF OF THIRD PARTIES | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 29, 2006 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jun 29, 2006 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Oct 19, 2005 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 19, 2005 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Oct 19, 2005 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Apr 22, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 20, 2005 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 20, 2005 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Nov 5, 2004 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 20, 2004 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Oct 20, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 3, 2004 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 28, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Apr 20, 2004 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Apr 20, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 21, 2003 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jul 29, 2003 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jul 9, 2003 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jun 4, 2003 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 2, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 2, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 12, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 9, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 9, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 18, 2002 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jul 18, 2002 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Jun 26, 2002 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 15, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 15, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 29, 2001 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 26, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 27, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 1, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |