USPTO serial 76009204
ARAKS.COM
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MATEJA, JOANNA
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with ARAKS.COM?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Springfield, PA
Springfield, PA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Paul F. D'Emilio
PAUL F DEMILIO PULEO & D'EMILIO, LLC660 SENTRY PKWY STE 210BLUE BELL, PA 19422UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | Providing computerized online ordering services in the field of women's underwear and lingerie | ACTIVE | Mar 1, 2001 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 17, 2004 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 24, 2003 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 24, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 8, 2003 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| May 30, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 1, 2003 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Jan 27, 2003 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Jan 27, 2003 | PETL | COMMUNICATION RECEIVED FROM PETITIONER | — |
| Jan 27, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 16, 2003 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 6, 2003 | PINM | INCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED | — |
| Nov 25, 2002 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 14, 2002 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 25, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 30, 2002 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Aug 14, 2002 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Jun 10, 2002 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 14, 2002 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Aug 14, 2001 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| May 22, 2001 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| May 9, 2001 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jan 31, 2001 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 20, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 4, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 18, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 9, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |