USPTO serial 76011276
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
BENJAMIN H. RAMINASH
BENJAMIN H RAMINASH ATER WYNNE LLP222 SW COLUMBIA STE 1800PORTLAND, OR 97201UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Computer software for facilitating the distribution, licensing, and use of business and personal computer software applications on a private or global communications network; computer software for facilitating the provision of network backbone services on a private or global communications network; computer software for facilitating, providing and assisting others in providing application service provider (ASP) services on a private or global communications networks | ACTIVE | Dec 1, 2001 |
| 042 | Designing and maintaining computer server systems for use in distributing, licensing and providing computer software applications to end-users with access to various business and personal computer software applications on a private or global communications network; online services for providing application service provider (ASP) services on a private or global communications network, namely, designing and implementing computer software for others | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 25, 2004 | ABN7 | ABANDONMENT - DEFECTIVE USE STATEMENT | — |
| Jun 12, 2003 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 19, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 5, 2003 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 28, 2003 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Nov 22, 2002 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Nov 22, 2002 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| Jun 3, 2002 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| May 15, 2002 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| May 15, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 26, 2001 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 7, 2001 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| May 22, 2001 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Feb 27, 2001 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jan 26, 2001 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Oct 21, 2000 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 12, 2000 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Aug 7, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 14, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |