USPTO serial 76011402
SERVO2GO
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Oct 6, 2009
- Examiner
- BELLO, ZACK
- Law office
- GENERIC WEB UPDATE
What this means
Status 800 means the registration was renewed after acceptable combined Section 8 and Section 9 filings. The mark remains registered for another 10-year term with active federal protection. Calendar the next Section 8 and 9 deadline in 10 years and maintain monitoring.
Need help with SERVO2GO?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Electromate Industrial Sales Limited
Vaughan, Ontario L4H 0K8, CA
Other trademarks owned by Electromate Industrial Sales Limited
VAUGHAN, ONTARIO, CA
Electromate Industrial Sales Limited
Woodbridge, Ontario, L4L 4C2, CA
Other trademarks owned by Electromate Industrial Sales Limited
Electromate Industrial Sales Limited
Woodbridge, Ontario, L4L 4C2, CA
Other trademarks owned by Electromate Industrial Sales Limited
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Michael J. Leonard
Michael J. Leonard Fox Rothschild LLP997 Lenox Drive, Bldg. 3Lawrenceville, NJ 08648-2311UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 007 | Brakes for machines; clutches for machines; pulleys being part of machines; gear components for machines; ball screws and linear actuators for machines; positioning systems being machine parts, namely, rodless cylinders, linear actuators, positioning tables, selective compliance assembly robot arm robots, linear bearings and guideways, acme screws, ball screws, linear modules and shaftings | ACTIVE | — |
| 009 | Programmable computer control products, namely, programmable logic controllers, single-board computers, micro controllers, operator interfaces, and programmable motion controllers; Electronic servo motor products and components, namely, alternating current servo motors, direct current servo motors, brushless direct current servo motors, permanent magnet direct current servo motors, disc-armature servo motors, resolvers, pulse with modulated servo amplifiers, linear servo amplifiers, sinusoidal servo amplifiers, linear servo motors; Electronic step motor products and components, namely, disk magnet stepper motors, linear stepper motors, direct current step motors, stepper drivers, indexes; positioning systems, namely, rotary stages | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Electromate Industrial Sales Limited
- Other trademarks owned by ELECTROMATE, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by Electromate Industrial Sales Limited
- Other trademarks owned by Electromate Industrial Sales Limited
- Other trademarks in Class 007
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Similar marks named SERVO2GO
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 10, 2019 | NA89 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 9 - E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 10, 2019 | RNL1 | REGISTERED AND RENEWED (FIRST RENEWAL - 10 YRS) | The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active. |
| Oct 10, 2019 | 89AG | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTED | The USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary. |
| Sep 23, 2019 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Aug 14, 2019 | E89R | TEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 6, 2018 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 22, 2017 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Nov 24, 2015 | NA85 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 15 - E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 24, 2015 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Nov 12, 2015 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Oct 2, 2015 | E815 | TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 6, 2009 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Sep 2, 2009 | DP1B | 1(B) BASIS DELETED; PROCEED TO REGISTRATION | — |
| Sep 2, 2009 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 2, 2009 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Aug 28, 2009 | IUCN | NOTICE OF ALLOWANCE CANCELLED | — |
| Aug 28, 2009 | D1BR | TEAS DELETE 1(B) BASIS RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 24, 2009 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Aug 24, 2009 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Feb 24, 2009 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Dec 2, 2008 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Nov 12, 2008 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Oct 30, 2008 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Oct 28, 2008 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 27, 2008 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Oct 20, 2008 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 20, 2008 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 20, 2008 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 18, 2008 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 18, 2008 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 18, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 17, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 17, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 17, 2008 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 20, 2008 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 20, 2008 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 20, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 20, 2008 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Mar 20, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 19, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 24, 2007 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 24, 2007 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Sep 24, 2007 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 22, 2007 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 21, 2007 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 21, 2007 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Mar 21, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 21, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Feb 15, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 17, 2006 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Aug 17, 2006 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 17, 2006 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Feb 16, 2006 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 16, 2006 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Feb 1, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 1, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 20, 2006 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jan 19, 2006 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 19, 2006 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jan 11, 2006 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jan 11, 2006 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 22, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 22, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 30, 2005 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jun 30, 2005 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 30, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jun 22, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 22, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 21, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 22, 2004 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Dec 21, 2004 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 17, 2004 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jun 2, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 2, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 2, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 4, 2003 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Oct 16, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Apr 23, 2003 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 25, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 25, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 15, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 25, 2002 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 23, 2002 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Mar 9, 2002 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 20, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 25, 2001 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Feb 9, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 10, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 21, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |