Drawing for CRQ

USPTO serial 76011829

CRQ

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
CARRUTHERS, SUE
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with CRQ?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

SUZY FULTON

SUZY FULTON DIGITALCONVERGENCE:COM INC9101 N CENTRAL EXPY FL 5DALLAS, TX 75231-5927UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009COMPUTER SOFTWARE, HARDWARE AND PERIPHERALS, NAMELY, SOFTWARE AND HARDWARE FOR INTERFACING BETWEEN THE INTERNET AND RADIO, TELEVISION AND PRINT MEDIA; COMPUTER SOFTWARE FOR INTERFACING WITH AN INPUT DEVICE SUCH AS A KEYSTROKE AUTOMATION APPLIANCE FOR READING AN ENCODED IMAGE AND CONVERTING IT TO KEYSTROKES; SOFTWARE FOR INTERFACING WITH THE OPERATING SYSTEM OF A PERSONAL COMPUTER TO ALLOW CODED INFORMATION TO BE INPUT THERETO BY A USER FOR THE PURPOSE OF ALLOWING THE USER TO INTERFACE WITH THE PERSONAL COMPUTER VIA THE CODED INFORMATION; AND ADDITIONAL SOFTWARE FOR LAUNCHING WEB PAGES ON THE INTERNET, SUCH AS VIA A LINK TO VARIOUS MEDIA AND TELECOMMUNICATIONS; SOFTWARE FOR AUDIBLY CONTROLLING A COMPUTER AND THE OPERATION THEREOF; SOFTWARE SYSTEM COMPRISING A SOFTWARE PROGRAM TO INTERFACE WITH THE INTERNET; AN AUDIO OR VIDEO TRANSDUCER FOR RECEIVING ENCODED AUDIO OR VIDEO; HAND-HELD INPUT DEVICES CAPABLE OF READING BAR CODES AND PROPRIETARY CODES FOR ALLOWING INPUT OF INFORMATION TO A COMPUTER DEVICE FOR RECEIVING CODED AUDIO FOR CONTROLLING A COMPUTER REMOTELY TO CONNECT TO THE INTERNET; MICEACTIVE
035PROVIDING INTERNET MARKETING SERVICES FOR OTHERS, NAMELY, DISSEMINATING ADVERTISING FOR OTHERS VIA THE INTERNETACTIVE
038TELECOMMUNICATIONS SERVICES, NAMELY, PROVIDING USERS, THROUGH THE CONVERGENCE OF HARDWARE AND SOFTWARE TECHNOLOGY, AN INTERFACE TO THE INTERNET; PROVIDING VENDORS, THROUGH THE CONVERGENCE OF HARDWARE AND SOFTWARE TECHNOLOGY, AN INTERFACE FOR BROADCASTING AND/OR PUBLISHING INFORMATION OR ENTERTAINMENT OVER THE INTERNETACTIVE
042COMPUTER SERVICES, NAMELY, PROVIDING HARDWARE AND SOFTWARE TECHNOLOGY FOR BROADCASTING AND/OR PUBLISHING INFORMATION OR ENTERTAINMENT OVER THE INTERNETACTIVE

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
May 13, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED
May 22, 2003ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Aug 13, 2002NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
May 21, 2002PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
May 1, 2002NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION
Jan 11, 2002CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Jan 9, 2002CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED
Jul 9, 2001CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 19, 2001CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Sep 20, 2000CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 8, 2000DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Sep 5, 2000DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance