USPTO serial 76014060
MOVIEFLY
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SAITO, KIM
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with MOVIEFLY?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
ANTONIO BORRELLI
ANTONIO BORRELLI COWAN, LIEBOWITZ & LATMAN, PC.1133 AVE OF THE AMERICASNEW YORK, NY 10036UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 028 | Action figures; dolls and doll clothing and accessories; battery operated action toys; board and card games; toy vehicles and accessories therefor; toy modeling dough; toy .putty; costume masks; face masks; swim masks; catchers' masks; dart games sets; toy die cast vehicles; doll trunks and cases; kites; toy wind socks; toy model hobbycraft kits; musical toys and toy musical instruments; playsets for dolls; playset buildings; plush toys; puppets; jigsaw puzzles; manipulative puzzles; radio controlled toy vehicles; radio controlled model vehicles; handheld unit for playing electronic games; role playing game sets; construction toys; toy construction blocks; children's multiple activity toy sets consisting of mazes, shape puzzles and matching set games | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 25, 2004 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jul 1, 2003 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 18, 2003 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Jun 18, 2003 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Feb 12, 2003 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 26, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 23, 2002 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Jul 15, 2002 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 27, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 24, 2002 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Dec 25, 2001 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Oct 2, 2001 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Sep 12, 2001 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jul 8, 2001 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 24, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 7, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 24, 2001 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Oct 16, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 25, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 22, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 14, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |