USPTO serial 76015311
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Elizabeth C. Buckingham
ELIZABETH C BUCKINGHAM DORSEY & WHITNEY LLPPILLSBURY CTR S220 S SIXTH STMINNEAPOLIS, MN 55402| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | Providing News and Information in the Fields of Buying and Selling of Media Advertisements via a Global Computer Network; Providing an On-Line Directory of Entities (And Their Representatives) That Purchase And/or Sell Media Time or space for the Placement of Advertisements via a Global Computer Network; Providing Information in the Nature of an Interactive Computerized Database in the Field of Advertising for Use Entities (And Their Representatives) That Purchase And/or Sell Media Time or Space for the Placement of Advertisements to Facilitate Advertising; Providing Online Invoicing for Media Purchases of Others | ACTIVE | Feb 5, 1997 |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 1, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 19, 2002 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 15, 2002 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jun 12, 2001 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jun 1, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 28, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 28, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 22, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 15, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |