USPTO serial 76021149
C-WATCH FLASH
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- FROMM, MARTHA L
- Law office
- TTAB
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with C-WATCH FLASH?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
DONALD A KAUL
LARRY B MILLER FEDER, KASZOVITZ, ISAACSON, WEBER, ET AL750 LEXINGTON AVENEW YORK, NY 10022-1200UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 028 | TOY, NAMELY, BATTERY-POWERED WATCH WITH LCD SCREEN WHICH FEATURES ANIMATION, COMPUTER GAMES, AND SOUND EFFECTS | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 7, 2005 | MAB4 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Apr 7, 2005 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Nov 9, 2004 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Aug 19, 2004 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Aug 19, 2004 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jul 30, 2004 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jul 8, 2004 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jul 8, 2004 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jul 8, 2004 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Oct 24, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 18, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 10, 2002 | TCAS | TEAS CORR ADDRESS REQUEST RECEIVED BUT NOT PROCESSED STAT IS TTAB | — |
| Jun 12, 2001 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jan 9, 2001 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 12, 2000 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Nov 10, 2000 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Oct 9, 2000 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 21, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |