USPTO serial 76023483
ROCA WEAR
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3007571Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Oct 18, 2005
- Examiner
- ALTREE, NICHOLAS
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 107
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with ROCA WEAR?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
ALPINE, NY
ALPINE, NY
Wilmington, DE
New York, NY
New York, NY
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 014 | JEWELRY AND WATCHES | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Feb 14, 2005 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by ROCAWEAR LICENSING, LLC
- Other trademarks owned by ROCAWEAR LICENSING, LLC
- Other trademarks owned by Studio IP Holdings LLC
- Other trademarks owned by COMET INTERCONTINENTAL, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by ROCAWEAR LICENSING, LLC
- Other trademarks in Class 014
- Similar marks named ROCA WEAR
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 20, 2016 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Jan 13, 2016 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Dec 5, 2012 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Oct 6, 2011 | NOSU | NOTICE OF SUIT | — |
| Jul 18, 2011 | NOSU | NOTICE OF SUIT | — |
| Jul 18, 2011 | NOSU | NOTICE OF SUIT | — |
| Jun 22, 2011 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Jun 21, 2011 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| May 18, 2011 | E815 | TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| May 6, 2010 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Mar 8, 2010 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 8, 2010 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| May 20, 2008 | NOSU | NOTICE OF SUIT | — |
| May 19, 2008 | NOSU | NOTICE OF SUIT | — |
| Apr 18, 2007 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Apr 18, 2007 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Apr 11, 2007 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Nov 8, 2006 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Jul 20, 2006 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Jul 20, 2006 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 18, 2005 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Sep 6, 2005 | REGV | LAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Sep 2, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 29, 2005 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Aug 27, 2005 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| May 9, 2005 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| May 9, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 9, 2004 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Aug 18, 2004 | ETOP | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE PROCESS - TERMINATED | — |
| Jun 4, 2003 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 29, 2003 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Apr 9, 2003 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Mar 7, 2003 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 4, 2003 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Oct 28, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 11, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 23, 2002 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| May 8, 2002 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 6, 2002 | 1.AD | SEC. 1(A) CLAIM DELETED | — |
| Mar 22, 2002 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Oct 29, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 9, 2001 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 9, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 9, 2001 | 1.BA | Sec. 1(B) CLAIM ADDED | — |
| Sep 26, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 20, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 18, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |