USPTO serial 76024638
TRI-PAR GOLF COURSES
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- STOIDES, KATHERINE
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with TRI-PAR GOLF COURSES?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Ontario P6C 3H8, CA
Ontario P6C 3H8, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
DONALD L. DENNISON
DONALD L DENNISON DENNISON SCHULTZ DOUGHERTY & MACDONALD1727 KING ST STE 105ALEXANDRIA, VA 22314-2700UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | video game cartridges | ACTIVE | — |
| 025 | clothing, namely caps, sweaters, Tee shirts, golf shoes and turtlenecks | ACTIVE | — |
| 028 | coin operated video games and hand held units for playing video games, golf clubs, golf club covers, golf club cases, golf bags, golf balls and golf board games | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | golf course design services | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by McBride, Scott
- Other trademarks owned by McBride, Scott
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 025
- Other trademarks in Class 028
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named TRI-PAR GOLF COURSES
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 21, 2006 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Aug 21, 2006 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Dec 20, 2005 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Sep 27, 2005 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Sep 7, 2005 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jul 15, 2005 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jul 11, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jul 1, 2005 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 1, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jun 27, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 24, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 2, 2005 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 2, 2005 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 22, 2004 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Apr 14, 2004 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 5, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Feb 27, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 27, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 27, 2004 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 28, 2003 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Oct 17, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 1, 2002 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jun 30, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 6, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 7, 2001 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Nov 6, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 5, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 16, 2001 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 16, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 26, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 19, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |