USPTO serial 76026305
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
BP 471, LU
BP 471, LU
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
David Bogart Dort
DAVID BOGART DORT HICKMAN STEPHENS COLEMAN & HUGHES LLP1825 EYE ST NW STE 400WASHINGTON, DC 20006UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Computer software, namely, software for improving speed, accuracy, and filtering for computer network search engines; computer software for financial problem solving via the Internet; computer software for outfitting operating systems with artificial intelligence algorithms which anticipate the needs of the user by monitoring the user's activity and optimizing the operating systems; computer programs to allow mobile phones and portable digital assistants to communicate with computer networks; computer software for forwarding electronic messages to global computer networks from mobile phones and portable digital assistants; electronic adapters for allowing mobile phones and portable digital assistants to communicate with computer networks; computer software for providing artificial intelligence to computer operating systems, namely, software used for improving efficiency, speed, searching capability, and customization of computer operating systems; computer software which provides artificial intelligence to commercial Internet sites for the purposes of improving online shopping, namely, software for use in facilitating product and service searching, financial transactions, software and data downloading, and consumer information distribution; computer software providing artificial intelligence to home computers or home connectable appliances, namely, televisions, VCR's, radios, stereos, entertainment centers, and DVD players, to improve global computer network searching, downloading, customizing, graphics and navigating capabilities; computer software for providing personal data manager operating systems with artificial intelligence capabilities to improve communications with computer networks, namely, software and information downloading from computer networks, searching and customization on computer networks; embedded microprocessors containing software programs that provide artificial intelligence which improve communications, searching, customization, and downloading capabilities on computer networks; computer programs which provide artificial intelligence to internet browser programs, namely, software for use in improving searching and customization capabilities; CD-ROMs containing the above listed computer programs | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 13, 2002 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Nov 27, 2001 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Sep 4, 2001 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Aug 15, 2001 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jun 4, 2001 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 24, 2001 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| May 3, 2001 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Nov 8, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 10, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 5, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 20, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |