USPTO serial 76027440
PYROMATE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- CASTRO, GIANCARLO
- Law office
- DIVISIONAL UNIT
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with PYROMATE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
BICC GENERAL PYROTENAX CABLES LIMITED
MERSEYSIDE L34 5TJ, GB
Other trademarks owned by BICC GENERAL PYROTENAX CABLES LIMITED
BICC GENERAL PYROTENAX CABLES LIMITED
MERSEYSIDE L34 5TJ, GB
Other trademarks owned by BICC GENERAL PYROTENAX CABLES LIMITED
WOKINGHAM BERKSHIRE, GB
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
MICHAEL J. SMITH
MONTGOMERY W SMITH TYCO ENGINEERED PRODUCTS & SERVICESTHREE HOLLAND WAYEXETER, NH 03833-2938UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 017 | non-metal seals for terminating mineral insulated electrical wire and cable | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by BICC GENERAL PYROTENAX CABLES LIMITED
- Other trademarks owned by BICC GENERAL PYROTENAX CABLES LIMITED
- Other trademarks owned by PYROTENAX CABLES LIMITED
- Other trademarks in Class 017
- Similar marks named PYROMATE
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 13, 2005 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| May 13, 2005 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jul 14, 2004 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 2, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jun 23, 2004 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Jun 23, 2004 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| May 5, 2004 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Mar 24, 2004 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Feb 1, 2004 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 8, 2004 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 8, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 25, 2003 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Jul 12, 2003 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 20, 2003 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Jun 20, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 19, 2003 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 4, 2003 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 18, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 14, 2002 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Nov 1, 2002 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 13, 2002 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 27, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 25, 2002 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Dec 25, 2001 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Oct 2, 2001 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Sep 12, 2001 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jul 12, 2001 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 24, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 7, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 2, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 11, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 28, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |